HK solicitors admitted overseas
This table analyses all solicitors admitted in HK and currently seen in the Law Society's Law List, whether practising or not. To which other jurisdictions they have been admitted, before or after being admitted to HK? Click a column heading to sort. Click a jurisdiction to see lawyers who have been admitted both there and in HK.
Some data are hidden to fit your display. Rotate?
| Jurisdiction | Lawyers | Before HK |
On or after HK |
Share before |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama, USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2 | Anguilla | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 3 | Manitoba, Canada | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 4 | Nauru | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 5 | Tasmania, Australia | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
| 6 | ACT, Australia | 159 | 32 | 127 | 20.1% |
| 7 | British Virgin Islands | 14 | 3 | 11 | 21.4% |
| 8 | Northern Territory, Australia | 4 | 1 | 3 | 25.0% |
| 9 | Northern Ireland | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% |
| 10 | England & Wales | 3257 | 1224 | 2033 | 37.6% |
| 11 | Singapore | 284 | 117 | 167 | 41.2% |
| 12 | Ireland | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 13 | Brunei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| 14 | Bermuda | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% |
| 15 | Victoria, Australia | 209 | 126 | 83 | 60.3% |
| 16 | Ontario, Canada | 58 | 45 | 13 | 77.6% |
| 17 | Alberta, Canada | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% |
| 18 | Queensland, Australia | 68 | 53 | 15 | 77.9% |
| 19 | New York, USA | 455 | 357 | 98 | 78.5% |
| 20 | New Zealand | 94 | 75 | 19 | 79.8% |
| 21 | British Columbia, Canada | 52 | 42 | 10 | 80.8% |
| 22 | New South Wales, Australia | 463 | 377 | 86 | 81.4% |
| 23 | China (People's Republic) | 67 | 55 | 12 | 82.1% |
| 24 | California, USA | 72 | 60 | 12 | 83.3% |
| 25 | South Australia, Australia | 18 | 16 | 2 | 88.9% |
| 26 | Washington, USA | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% |
| 27 | India | 13 | 12 | 1 | 92.3% |
| 28 | West Australia, Australia | 33 | 31 | 2 | 93.9% |
| 29 | Scotland | 22 | 21 | 1 | 95.5% |
| 30 | Belgium | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 31 | Colorado, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 32 | Connecticut, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 33 | District of Columbia, USA | 22 | 22 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 34 | Florida, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 35 | France | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 36 | Georgia, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 37 | Germany | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 38 | Hawaii, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 39 | Illinois, USA | 8 | 8 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40 | Indiana, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 41 | Israel | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 42 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 43 | Japan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 44 | Kentucky, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 45 | Maine, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 46 | Malaysia | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 47 | Marshall Islands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 48 | Maryland, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 49 | Massachusetts, USA | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 50 | Minnesota, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 51 | Missouri, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 52 | Nebraska, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 53 | Nepal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 54 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 55 | Nevada,USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 56 | New Jersey, USA | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 57 | North Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 58 | Ohio, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 59 | Oregon, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 60 | Pakistan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 61 | Papua New Guinea | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 62 | Pennsylvania, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 63 | Philippines | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 64 | Quebec, Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 65 | Russia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 66 | Saskatchewan, Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 67 | South Africa | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 68 | South Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 69 | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 70 | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 71 | Taiwan | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 72 | Texas, USA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 73 | Virginia, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 74 | Wisconsin, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy
Webb-site.com was originally created by David M Webb MBE
We are committed to maintaining high quality and expanding the database with additional data and insight.