HK solicitors admitted overseas
This table analyses all solicitors admitted in HK and currently seen in the Law Society's Law List, whether practising or not. To which other jurisdictions they have been admitted, before or after being admitted to HK? Click a column heading to sort. Click a jurisdiction to see lawyers who have been admitted both there and in HK.
Some data are hidden to fit your display. Rotate?
| Jurisdiction | Lawyers | Before HK |
On or after HK |
Share before |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belgium | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Colorado, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Connecticut, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 4 | District of Columbia, USA | 22 | 22 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 5 | Florida, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 6 | France | 6 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 7 | Georgia, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 8 | Germany | 7 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 9 | Hawaii, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 10 | Illinois, USA | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 11 | Indiana, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 12 | Israel | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 13 | Italy | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 14 | Japan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 15 | Kentucky, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 16 | Maine, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 17 | Malaysia | 45 | 45 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 18 | Marshall Islands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 19 | Maryland, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 20 | Massachusetts, USA | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 21 | Michigan, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 22 | Minnesota, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 23 | Missouri, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 24 | Nebraska, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 25 | Nepal | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 26 | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 27 | Nevada,USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 28 | New Jersey, USA | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 29 | North Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 30 | Ohio, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 31 | Oregon, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 32 | Pakistan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 33 | Papua New Guinea | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 34 | Pennsylvania, USA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 35 | Philippines | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 36 | Quebec, Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 37 | Russia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 38 | Saskatchewan, Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 39 | South Africa | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 40 | South Carolina, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 41 | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 42 | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 43 | Taiwan | 9 | 9 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 44 | Texas, USA | 4 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 45 | Virginia, USA | 2 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 46 | Wisconsin, USA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 47 | Scotland | 25 | 24 | 1 | 96.0% |
| 48 | West Australia, Australia | 34 | 32 | 2 | 94.1% |
| 49 | India | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
| 50 | South Australia, Australia | 18 | 16 | 2 | 88.9% |
| 51 | Washington, USA | 9 | 8 | 1 | 88.9% |
| 52 | California, USA | 75 | 63 | 12 | 84.0% |
| 53 | New South Wales, Australia | 468 | 383 | 85 | 81.8% |
| 54 | China (People's Republic) | 69 | 56 | 13 | 81.2% |
| 55 | British Columbia, Canada | 52 | 42 | 10 | 80.8% |
| 56 | New Zealand | 96 | 76 | 20 | 79.2% |
| 57 | New York, USA | 475 | 376 | 99 | 79.2% |
| 58 | Alberta, Canada | 9 | 7 | 2 | 77.8% |
| 59 | Queensland, Australia | 70 | 54 | 16 | 77.1% |
| 60 | Ontario, Canada | 64 | 49 | 15 | 76.6% |
| 61 | Victoria, Australia | 213 | 126 | 87 | 59.2% |
| 62 | Bermuda | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.1% |
| 63 | Brunei | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| 64 | Ireland | 27 | 13 | 14 | 48.1% |
| 65 | Singapore | 289 | 119 | 170 | 41.2% |
| 66 | England & Wales | 3337 | 1262 | 2075 | 37.8% |
| 67 | Northern Ireland | 8 | 3 | 5 | 37.5% |
| 68 | Northern Territory, Australia | 5 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% |
| 69 | ACT, Australia | 162 | 32 | 130 | 19.8% |
| 70 | British Virgin Islands | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18.8% |
| 71 | Tasmania, Australia | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13.3% |
| 72 | Alabama, USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 73 | Anguilla | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 74 | Manitoba, Canada | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 75 | Nauru | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
Copyright & disclaimer, Privacy policy